AutoNotes vs Blueprint: 2026 AI Scribe Comparison

Introduction

As behavioral health professionals increasingly turn to technology for support, AI scribes and note-taking tools have emerged as valuable resources. AutoNotes and Blueprint are two prominent players in this arena, each offering unique features and capabilities. This article provides an objective comparison between AutoNotes and Blueprint, focusing on their core AI functionalities, workflow support, compliance with regulations, customization options, pricing, and suitability for different user types. By understanding these aspects, clinicians can make informed decisions about which tool best meets their needs.

Overview of Each Product

AutoNotes

AutoNotes is an AI-powered clinical workspace designed specifically for behavioral health professionals. It streamlines the documentation process by converting spoken or written session input into structured, HIPAA- and PHIPA-compliant notes in seconds. With over 75,000 clinicians using the platform, AutoNotes helps providers save significant time each week, reduce burnout, and improve documentation quality without compromising privacy or professional voice.

Blueprint

Blueprint markets itself as an AI-powered note-taking tool aimed at simplifying the documentation process for therapists and other healthcare professionals. It emphasizes ease of use and integration with existing workflows, allowing users to generate notes quickly. While Blueprint offers some compliance features, its primary focus is on user-friendly note creation rather than the stringent compliance standards that AutoNotes upholds.

Core AI Capabilities

AutoNotes

• Multi-Input Capture: AutoNotes allows for diverse input methods including free text, dictation, and full session recordings. This flexibility ensures that clinicians can document their sessions in the way that feels most comfortable and efficient for them.
• Real-Time Note Generation: The platform generates structured notes almost immediately after input, significantly reducing the time spent on documentation.
• Template Variety: AutoNotes supports various note formats, including SOAP, DAP, BIRP, and treatment plans, accommodating different clinical documentation styles.

Blueprint

• Basic Note Generation: Blueprint provides an AI-driven note generation system that focuses on converting clinician inputs into structured notes quickly.
• Voice Recognition: The platform includes dictation capabilities, but may not offer the same depth of multi-input capture as AutoNotes.
• Standard Templates: Blueprint offers a limited selection of basic templates for note-taking, which may not cater to all clinical documentation needs.

Supported Workflows

AutoNotes

• Live Sessions: Clinicians can document notes in real-time during sessions using dictation or free text.
• Uploads: Users can upload existing notes or session recordings to enhance documentation continuity.
• Retrospective Notes: AutoNotes allows for the creation of notes after sessions have concluded, using audio recordings or memory prompts.

Blueprint

• Live Session Documentation: Blueprint supports real-time note-taking during client meetings, but may lack the flexibility of multi-input methods.
• Limited Upload Capabilities: Blueprint does not provide extensive support for uploading past notes or recordings, limiting retrospective documentation.
• Post-Session Notes: Users can create notes after sessions, but functionality may not be as robust or flexible as AutoNotes.

Compliance and PHI Handling

AutoNotes

AutoNotes is designed with compliance as a top priority. The platform ensures that all documentation workflows adhere to HIPAA and PHIPA standards, providing clinicians with the confidence that their notes are secure and compliant.

• De-Identification: AutoNotes employs advanced de-identification protocols to protect patient information.
• Data Security: The platform uses AES-256 encryption for data at rest and TLS 1.2+ encryption for data in transit, ensuring that all sensitive information remains secure.
• Control Over PHI: Clinicians have complete control over their data retention and deletion preferences, ensuring that personal health information is handled ethically and responsibly.

Blueprint

While Blueprint includes some compliance features, its focus is not as stringent as that of AutoNotes. Blueprint does not explicitly advertise its compliance with HIPAA or PHIPA, which may raise concerns for some users.

• Basic Data Security: Blueprint employs standard security measures, but details about encryption and data handling are less comprehensive compared to AutoNotes.
• Limited PHI Control: Users may not have the same level of control over their data handling preferences as offered by AutoNotes.

Customization Depth

AutoNotes

AutoNotes excels in customization, allowing clinicians to tailor their workflows according to their specific needs. Users can:

• Create personalized templates for various note types to ensure consistency across documentation.
• Adjust settings for dictation and input preferences to match their unique workflow.
• Utilize contextual client charts that build over time, enhancing the continuity and quality of care.

Blueprint

Blueprint offers limited customization options. While users can create basic templates, the depth of customization does not match that of AutoNotes. Blueprint’s focus on simplicity may appeal to users who prefer straightforward solutions but might not satisfy those needing tailored documentation.

Pricing

AutoNotes

AutoNotes operates on a subscription-based pricing model, which varies based on the features and the scale of usage. Users can expect competitive pricing that reflects the extensive features and compliance standards offered by the platform. The potential for reclaiming over 7 hours of documentation time weekly often translates into financial benefits that can offset subscription costs.

Blueprint

Blueprint also follows a subscription pricing model, typically offering lower rates compared to AutoNotes. However, potential users should weigh the cost against the compliance and customization capabilities provided by AutoNotes to ensure they are making a value-driven decision.

Who Each Tool Is Best Suited For

AutoNotes

AutoNotes is best suited for:

• Licensed therapists, social workers, and psychologists who require robust compliance and high-quality documentation.
• Clinicians working in environments with strict regulatory requirements where HIPAA and PHIPA compliance is critical.
• Practitioners who value flexibility in documentation methods and customization options to suit their specific workflows.
• Providers looking to reclaim time and reduce burnout through efficient documentation processes.

Blueprint

Blueprint is suitable for:

• Clinicians seeking a straightforward, user-friendly note-taking solution without extensive customization needs.
• Individuals or small practices that prioritize cost over compliance and advanced features.
• Providers who primarily need basic note generation without the complexity of multi-input capture or retrospective documentation.

Conclusion

In comparing AutoNotes and Blueprint, it is clear that both tools offer unique advantages for behavioral health professionals. AutoNotes stands out with its compliance-first approach, extensive customization options, and flexible documentation workflows. This makes it an ideal choice for clinicians who require high-quality, secure, and efficient documentation.

On the other hand, Blueprint may appeal to users looking for a simpler, more cost-effective solution, although it lacks some of the advanced features and compliance assurances provided by AutoNotes. Ultimately, the choice between these two platforms should be based on individual needs, regulatory requirements, and preferences for documentation workflows.

‍