AutoNotes vs Sharenote: 2026 EHR Review

AutoNotes vs Sharenote: A Comprehensive Comparison

In the ever-evolving landscape of healthcare technology, Electronic Health Records (EHRs) play a pivotal role in streamlining clinical workflows and enhancing patient care. Among the myriad options available, AutoNotes and Sharenote stand out as two noteworthy platforms. While Sharenote represents a traditional EHR, AutoNotes distinguishes itself as an AI-first solution designed to expedite documentation and improve overall efficiency. In this article, we will delve into a detailed comparison of both platforms, discussing their features, compliance handling, pricing, and more.

Overview of Each Platform

AutoNotes

AutoNotes is an AI-driven clinical workspace tailored for behavioral health professionals. It automates the documentation process, allowing clinicians to focus more on patient care by generating structured notes in seconds. With a pricing model starting at $29 per month, AutoNotes is designed to enhance the efficiency of clinical documentation without compromising compliance or ethical standards. Its focus on automated treatment plans and customizable workflows makes it a suitable option for a diverse range of practitioners.

Sharenote

Sharenote is a traditional EHR platform that offers a wide array of features to support health care providers. Targeted primarily at mental health professionals, Sharenote provides comprehensive documentation, billing, and reporting capabilities. However, it relies on conventional methods for data entry and documentation, which may not be as efficient as the automation offered by newer solutions like AutoNotes. Sharenote typically charges a higher price point compared to AutoNotes, which may be a consideration for some practices.

Who Each Platform Is Best For

• AutoNotes: Ideal for solo clinicians, small group practices, and behavioral health providers looking for an efficient, cost-effective solution to manage documentation and treatment plans.
• Sharenote: Best suited for larger practices or clinics that require a more comprehensive EHR solution with extensive reporting and billing features, as well as providers who prefer a traditional documentation approach.

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Documentation

AutoNotes: The hallmark of AutoNotes is its AI-powered documentation feature, allowing clinicians to dictate or type notes that are transformed into structured formats almost instantly. This significantly reduces the time spent on documentation, freeing up hours each week for clinicians to focus on patient care. Notes are generated with HIPAA compliance in mind, ensuring that patient information remains secure and confidential.

Sharenote: Sharenote provides a more traditional documentation approach, where clinicians manually enter data into the system. While it does offer templates for various types of notes, this process can be time-consuming and may lead to inconsistencies in documentation quality.

Treatment Plans

AutoNotes: The platform automates the creation of treatment plans based on session input, allowing for quick adjustments and updates. This feature not only saves time but also ensures that treatment plans are aligned with the latest client information and clinical insights.

Sharenote: Sharenote allows users to create treatment plans, but the process is less automated. Clinicians must manually input information, which can lead to longer turnaround times in delivering comprehensive treatment plans to clients.

Scheduling

AutoNotes: Currently, AutoNotes does not offer integrated scheduling features, but this may be addressed in future updates. Clinicians can utilize external scheduling tools alongside AutoNotes for a complete workflow.

Sharenote: Sharenote includes scheduling capabilities, allowing clinicians to manage appointments directly within the platform. This can be beneficial for practices that require a centralized solution for both scheduling and documentation.

Billing

AutoNotes: Billing features are not included in AutoNotes at this time. However, the platform's focus on documentation and treatment plans allows clinicians to efficiently prepare for billing processes through accurate note-taking.

Sharenote: Sharenote provides robust billing functionalities, enabling practices to handle claims and track payments effectively. This feature can streamline the financial side of practice management for larger organizations.

Reporting

AutoNotes: While AutoNotes does not currently offer extensive reporting features, its focus on documentation allows for improved data collection, which can be leveraged for reporting purposes in other software tools.

Sharenote: Sharenote excels in reporting capabilities, providing comprehensive analytics and insights to help practices monitor performance metrics and improve clinical outcomes.

Compliance and PHI Handling

Both AutoNotes and Sharenote prioritize compliance with HIPAA and PHIPA regulations, ensuring that personal health information (PHI) is handled securely.

• AutoNotes: All documentation generated is designed to meet strict compliance standards. The platform utilizes AES-256 encryption for data at rest and TLS 1.2+ for data in transit, safeguarding PHI from unauthorized access. Additionally, AutoNotes does not use client data for AI model training, which enhances privacy.
• Sharenote: Sharenote also adheres to HIPAA regulations, employing encryption methods to protect patient data. The platform's traditional structure may require additional administrative oversight to ensure compliance, particularly given the manual nature of data entry.

Pricing

AutoNotes: With pricing starting at just $29 per month, AutoNotes offers an affordable option for clinicians looking to streamline their documentation process. This competitive pricing makes it accessible to a wide range of practitioners, especially solo clinicians and small practices.

Sharenote: Sharenote generally has higher pricing tiers, which may limit its accessibility for some practitioners. The costs can vary based on the features selected, making it essential for potential users to evaluate their specific needs against the pricing structure.

Pros and Cons

AutoNotes

• Pros:
  • AI-powered documentation reduces time spent on paperwork.
  • Affordable pricing starting at $29 per month.
  • Automated treatment plans ensure consistency and quality.
  • Focus on compliance and data security.
• Cons:
  • Currently lacks integrated scheduling and billing features.
  • Reporting capabilities are limited compared to traditional EHRs.

Sharenote

• Pros:
  • Comprehensive features for documentation, billing, and reporting.
  • Integrated scheduling capabilities.
  • Strong reporting tools for performance analytics.
• Cons:
  • Higher pricing may deter solo practitioners.
  • Manual data entry can be time-consuming and lead to inconsistencies.

Summary: When to Choose AutoNotes Over Sharenote

Clinicians seeking to enhance their documentation efficiency while maintaining compliance will find AutoNotes to be a compelling option. Its AI-driven automation allows for quick note generation and treatment plan creation, making it an ideal choice for solo practitioners and smaller practices aiming to reduce administrative burdens. On the other hand, Sharenote may be more appealing to larger organizations that require comprehensive reporting and billing functionalities.

Ultimately, the decision between AutoNotes and Sharenote will depend on the specific needs of the practice, the desired level of automation, and budget considerations. For those who prioritize speed and efficiency in documentation, AutoNotes stands out as a valuable resource in the realm of behavioral health EHRs.

References

• [source:1] Best Practices for Electronic Health Record Documentation - American Academy of Pediatrics

‍